Announcement PDF 6 March 2025 AR3 intersects shallow Uranium occurrence at Overland Highlights: • New shallow Uranium occurrence identified: Drill hole OV047 encountered a 6 meter interval of carbonate-cemented sediments from 27 meters, with anomalous gamma and pXRF uranium readings. • Potential for the presence of an additional uranium model: Hole OVO47 demonstrates potential for near-surface, calcrete-hosted mineralisation (see Figure 1) - similar to uranium deposits 1 mined in Namibia 2 - in addition to AR3’s initial palaeochannel hosted ISR amenable uranium deposit targets. • Accelerated follow-up drilling: Drilling program will re-commence in the week beginning 10 March 2025 to follow up the shallow uranium occurrence intersected in hole OV047. • Rapid assay and minerology analysis: Samples generated from hole OV047 are being prioritised for assay and mineralogical determinations. • Palaeovalley extension confirmed with multiple Uranium targets: Drilling has successfully defined the southern extension of a key palaeovalley within the southern portion of EL7001 and extending into EL6678 (See Figure 2). • Engage with this announcement at the AR3 investor hub. AR3 Managing Director and CEO, Travis Beinke, said: “The intersection of a shallow uranium occurrence in OV047 is a significant step forward in our exploration program at Overland. The identification of shallow mineralisation, coupled with the confirmation of the palaeovalley's southern extension, underscores and reinforces the potential of this project. Our systematic approach to exploration and targeted drilling, continues to deliver results. We are excited to accelerate our follow up drilling to further delineate the extent of this new uranium occurrence and test the numerous high-priority targets we have identified. We look forward to reporting further results as we continue our drilling program through to the end of April." See Paladin Energy (ASX: PDN) release 2 April 2024 “Commercial production achieved at the Langer Heinrich Mine” 2 Wilde, A. Towards a Mineral Systems Model for Surficial Uranium Mineralization Based on Deposits in the Erongo District of Namibia. Minerals 2023, 13, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13020149 1 Figure 1: Strip log displaying drillhole OV047 lithology, natural gamma responses (cps) and pXRF uranium responses (ppm U). In relation to the disclosure of pXRF results, the Company cautions that estimates of uranium elemental abundance from pXRF results should not be considered a proxy for quantitative analysis of a laboratory assay result. Assay results are required to determine the actual widths and grade of the mineralisation. The company uses an Olympus Vanta M Series portable X-ray Fluorescence (pXRF) analyzer to screen Air Core drilling samples for mineralization prior to submitting samples to a commercial laboratory for assay. This provides an initial understanding of the mineralization distribution before sampling, ensuring submitted samples are representative of the targeted mineralization. While pXRF confirms the presence of mineralization, it does not accurately determine elemental concentrations due to limitations such as a small analysis window, uneven distribution, shallow penetration depth, and irregular surfaces. The pXRF results are indicative and the pXRF readings are subject to confirmation by chemical analysis from an independent laboratory. Australian Rare Earths Limited (ASX: AR3) is pleased to announce highly encouraging results from its ongoing exploration drilling program at the Overland Uranium Project. The 2025 program, which began 30 January 2025, has focused on mapping the newly defined palaeovalley (refer ASX release 21 January 2025) further south within EL7001 and onto the Sheer Gold Farm-In tenure, EL6678 3. A total of 22 drillholes has been completed, totaling 3,010 meters, illustrated in Figure 2. Target 1 of EL6678, drillhole OV047 has intersected a 6 meter interval containing anomalous gamma and pXRF Uranium (U) responses. Gamma responses peaked at 741 counts per second (cps), with maximum pXRF uranium response of 105ppm U. This surficial uranium occurrence is similar to uranium mineralisation found in Namibia’s surficial uranium deposits, like Paladin Energy’s Langer Heinrich Mine. Similar calcrete-hosted deposits are also found in Western Australia 4 at Cameco Corporation’s Yeelirrie deposit and Toro Energy’s Wiluna project. The identification of another potential uranium occurrence model at Overland highlights the region’s fertility, where uranium in solution enters the basin and is captured at various geochemical interfaces within the sedimentary sequences. Drillhole OV047 shows anomalous uranium responses over a 6 meter interval from 27 meters and displayed the highest gamma response yet seen at the base of oxidation interface with reduced sediments. These findings suggest potential for both deeper palaeochannel hosted, in-situ recoverable (ISR) deposits and shallow surficial deposits in this setting. ASX: AR3 Release 19 Nov 2024 Bijal Chudasama, Alok Porwal, Ignacio González-Álvarez, Sanchari Thakur, Andy Wilde, Oliver P. Kreuzer, Calcrete-hosted surficial uranium systems in Western Australia: Prospectivity modeling and quantitative estimates of resources. Part 1 – Origin of calcrete uranium deposits in surficial environments: A review, Ore Geology Reviews, Volume 102, 2018, Pages 906-936, ISSN 0169-1368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.04.024. 3 4 Figure 2: Overland drilling (2024 & 2025) with airborne radiometrics, alluvial sediment channels, and interpreted palaeochannel boundary based on recent drilling. Target 1/OV047 has been prioritized for follow up drilling. Note: The airborne radiometric image and Alluvial Sediment Outline is publicly available data sourced from SARIG ( https://map.sarig.sa.gov.au) and detailed within the appendices of this report. Figure 3: Cross section A-A1 across the defined palaeovalley showing lithology, pXRF U (ppm), and Gamma (CPS) see Figure 2 for section location plan. Figure 4: Cross section B-B1 across the defined palaeovalley showing lithology, pXRF U (ppm), and Gamma (CPS) see Figure 2 for section location plan. Next steps AR3’s initial 2025 drilling program will be extended and will follow up the shallow uranium occurrence intersected in hole OV047 to determine its extent. Samples recovered from drillhole OV047 are being prioritised for chemical assay and sub samples are being assessed for mineralogical characteristics informing the nature of the uranium mineralisation and its potential for economic recovery. In addition, initial high priority targets on EL6678 will be drill tested targeting deeper palaeochannel hosted, in-situ recoverable (ISR) deposits. Drilling will also target the highly prospective drill targets along the western margin of a palaeovalley setting within EL7001 defined through drilling completed in 2024 and more recently in 2025 (Figure 2). The announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Australian Rare Earths Limited. For further information please contact: Australian Rare Earths Limited Travis Beinke Managing Director and CEO T: 1 300 646 100 Media Enquiries Jessica Fertig Tau Media E: info@taumedia.com.au Engage and Contribute at the AR3 investor hub: https://investorhub.ar3.com.au/ Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report that relates to Exploration results is based on information compiled by Australian Rare Earths Limited and reviewed by Mr Rick Pobjoy who is the Chief Technical Officer of the Company and a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Pobjoy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation, the type of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Pobjoy consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. About Australian Rare Earths Limited Australian Rare Earths is committed to the timely exploration and development of its 100% owned, flagship Koppamurra Project, located in the new Koppamurra rare earths Province in southeastern South Australia and western Victoria. Koppamurra is a prospective ionic clay hosted rare earth deposit, rich in all the elements required in the manufacture of rare earth permanent magnets which are essential components in electric vehicles, wind turbines and domestic appliances. In addition, AR3 is actively reviewing other potential prospective areas which may also host uranium and ionic clay hosted rare earth deposits throughout Australia. The Company is focused on executing a growth strategy that aims to position AR3 as an independent and sustainable source of energy transition metals, playing a pivotal role in the global transition to a green economy. JORC Table 1 Criteria Sampling techniques Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Explanation Comment Nature and quality of Air Core drilling methods were used to obtain samples from the Overland drilling program sampling (e.g., cut channels, random chips, or between October-December 2024 and JanuaryMarch 2025 specific specialised industry standard The following information details the Air Core drill measurement tools sampling process: appropriate to the minerals under • All Air Core drill samples were collected from investigation, such as the rotary splitter mounted at the bottom of down hole gamma sondes, the cyclone into a pre‐numbered calico bag. or handheld XRF The samples were geologically logged at 1 m instruments, etc). These intervals. examples should not be taken as limiting the broad • Based on hole‐diameter, generic material density and a 20% split on the cyclone meaning of sampling. samples averaged ~1.5‐2.5 kg in mass. Include reference to measures taken to • Chip trays were used to collect a ensure sample representative sample for each 1m sample representivity and the interval for each hole. appropriate calibration • After the samples were collected within the of any measurement calico bags, they were screened for tools or systems used. anomalous gamma radiation using a Aspects of the handheld Ranger EXP survey meter (S/N determination of R318772) calibrated 23/09/2024 prior to mineralisation that are being geologically logged and tested with a Material to the Public pXRF at the drill site. Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (e.g., ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g., • The gamma screening was conducted by placing the handheld Ranger survey meter ~10cm from the calico sample for 5‐10sec and noting the dose rate in µSv. If elevated dose rates were detected the field crew was then notified before any additional sample logging was conducted and the anomalous reading recorded in the geological log. • A handheld Olympus Vanta pXFR Analyser (Model Vanta M Series S/N 842924) was used to assess the geochemistry of the Air Core samples in the field. The pXRF analysis provided screening analysis to characterize the sample lithology and full suite of elements. • The pXRF sampling was analized through the calico bag with a beam count time of 20-30 sec beam 1 and 10 sec beam 2. One pXRF analysis submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. per sample was performed. • Samples are laid on a workbench and flattened to create a stable surface for the pXRF. The pXRF is placed on the sample with the beam down for the analysis. • All readings were taken at ambient temperatures between 10 and 45 degrees Celsius. The Olympus Vanta is rated for continuous operation within these temperatures. • Samples range from dry to wet, this is dependent on which formation is being intercepted and whether drilling water has been injected. • A Uranium standard Oreas 121 (215 ppm U, sourced from Mantra Resources Nyota Prospect, Tanzania, which is a Tabular Sandstone hosted deposit) was used to verify the accuracy of the pXRF before and after each analysis session. • The OREAS 121 standard was prepared using an industry standard pXRF sample cup and analized for 20-30 sec on beam 1 and 10 Sec on beam 2. • A silica blank is used to monitor the accumulation of contamination on the lens of the pXRF. Analysis of the blank is undertaken before and after each analysis session. • Review of pXRF standard and blank data is checked to ensure the pXRF is operating correctly before and after each session. • Samples were selected for assay at the end of the hole based on geology, pXRF, and natural downhole gamma response. • Field duplicates were taken at a rate of ~1:40 and inserted blindly into the sample batches. • Field Standards were taken at a rate of ~1:40 and inserted blindly into the samples batches. • Samples were submitted to Bureau Veritas in Adelaide for analysis. The sample weights were recorded (wet and dry) and samples were oven dried at 105 degrees for a minimum of 24 hours. The samples were secondary crushed to 3 mm fraction and then pulverised to 90% passing 75 µm. Excess residue was maintained for storage while the rest of the sample placed in 8x4 packets and sent to the central weighing laboratory. The samples were submitted for analysis using Mixed Acid Digest – Lithium Borate Fusion ICP‐MS method (BV Code SC302) for Ag (0.1), Al (100), As (1), Ba (1), Be (0.5), Bi (0.1), Ca (100), Cd (0.5), Ce (0.1), Co (1), Cr (10), Cs (0.1), Cu (1), Dy (0.05), Er (0.05), Eu (0.05), Fe (100), Ga (0.2), Gd (0.2), Hf (0.2), Ho (0.02), In (0.05), K (100), La (0.5), Li (0.5), Lu (0.02), Mg (100), Mn (2), Mo (0.5), Na (100), Nb (0.5), Nd (0.05), Ni (2), P (100), Pb (1), Pr (0.2), Rb (0.2), Re (0.1), S (50), Sb (0.1), Sc (1), Se (5), Si (100), Sm (0.05), Sn (1), Sr (0.5), Ta (0.1), Tb (0.02), Te (0.2), Th (0.1), Ti (50), Tl (0.1), Tm (0.2), U (0.1), V (5), W (0.5), Y (0.1), Zn (2), Zr (1), Yb (0.05) • Select samples, often at the bottom of the thought to be weathered holes basement/saprolite material were also analyzed for gold using Lead collection Fire Assay AAS (BV Code FA001) • A laboratory repeat was taken at ~ 1 in 21 samples; • Commercially obtained standards were inserted by the laboratory at a rate of ~ 1 in 9 into the sample sequence. • After the hole was drilled to completion a Reflex EZ Gamma logging tool (serial number GAM‐043) rented from Imdex, and operated by the drilling crew was run down the hole, inside the rods/innertube to log the natural gamma response of the sediments. The gamma tool was last calibrated by Imdex on October 9th 2024 as noted in the provided Certificate of Conformance. • The survey was run in and out of the hole at a speed of no more than 10m/min and the downhole speed was reviewed after the survey. • The up (out) survey was then used to plot on sections, after reviewing both in and out gamma surveys. • Before each downhole gamma survey the Reflex EZ Gamma logging tool was checked with a EZ‐Gamma confidence checker by AR3 staff (S/N 025). The confidence checker was last calibrated 29/08/24. • Using the EZ‐Gamma confidence checker at the start of each run allows the gamma tool to be checked ensuring it is within specifications and the tool has not been damaged or faulty providing confidence an accurate gamma reading is collected for each hole. • The check is completed by first running the gamma tool for 5min to measure background gamma, then a second survey after sliding the EZ‐Gamma Confidence checker over the gamma probe and subtracting the background. The resulting pass value of ~600 cps +/‐ 5% is required before the survey tool is confirmed as operating within expected limits. • After the gamma survey is completed the data is uploaded to the Imdex hub IQ portal (https://iq.imdexhub.com) from the rig via satellite internet and available for review. • The Fairview uranium occurrence shown on maps within this report is based on reported SA Geodatabase Reference sample #152296 (Explorers sample 45835) sourced from the SA Geodatabase available on SARIG https://minerals.sarig.sa.gov.au/RockSamp leDetails.aspx?SampleNo=45835 • Sample #152296 was collected by A.F. Crooks on 20/08/1984 and the sample was analyzed by XRF. Details on the lab or XRF device were not specified. Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open‐ hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g., core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face‐ • • Drilling was completed using a Wallis “Mantis 200”Air Core drill rig with an onboard Sullair compressor (560cfm @ 200psi). Aircore drilling is a form of reverse circulation drilling where the sample is sampling bit, or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support collected at the face and returned inside the inner tube. The drill cuttings are removed by injection of compressed air into the hole via the annular area between the inner tube and the drill rod. • Aircore drill rods used were 3 m long. • NQ diameter (76 mm) drill bits and rods were used. • All aircore drill holes were vertical with depths varying between ~50 m and 200 m. Drill sample recovery for Air Core drilling is monitored by recording sample condition descriptions where ‘Poor’ to ‘Very Poor’ were used to identify any samples recovered which were potentially not representative of the interval drilled. • A comment was included where water injection was required to recover the sample from a particular interval. The use of water injection can potentially bias a sample. Minimal water injection was required during this drilling program and used sparingly. • Overall no consistent/significant loses of sample material was observed. • The rotary splitter was set to an approximate 20% split, which produced approximately 1.5‐2.5 kg sample for each meter interval. • The 1.5‐2.5 kg sample was collected in a pre‐ numbered calico bag and the remaining 80% (5 kg to 8 kg) was disposed directly into the sump as drilling progressed. • At the end of each drill rod, the drill string is cleaned by blowing down with air to remove any clay and silt potentially built up in the sample pipes and cyclone. • The relationship (if any) between sample recovery and grade is unknown • No sample recovery information was reported in historical reports relating to historical drilling within this release. • All Air Core samples collected in calico bags were logged for lithology, colour, cement type, hardness, percentage rock estimate, and any relevant comments such as moisture, sample condition, evidence of • appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and • metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and • percentage of the relevant intersections logged. • Sub‐sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all cores taken. If non‐core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub‐sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in‐ situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second‐half sampling. reducing or oxidizing conditions, and vegetation/organic material. Geological logging data for all drill holes was qualitatively logged onto Microsoft Excel spreadsheet using a field laptop with validation rules built into the spreadsheet including specific drop‐ down menus for each variable. The data was uploaded to the Australian Rare Earths Azure Data Studio database. Every drill hole was logged in full and logging was undertaken with reference to a drilling template with codes prescribed and guidance to ensure consistent and systematic data collection. The density drilling is not sufficient to support consideration of resource estimation, or mining and no geotechnical logging was completed. • 1m Air Core sample interval was homogenised within the cyclone and the rotary splitter was set to an approximate 20% split producing around 1.5‐2.5 kg sample for each metre interval. • The 1.5‐2.5kg sample was collected in a pre‐ numbered calico bag and the 80% (5 kg to 8 kg) portion was disposed directly into the sump as drilling progressed. • Duplicates were generally taken within intervals which indicated potential for anomalous U mineralization based on geology, pXRF, and gamma signature. These duplicate samples were collected by splitting the 1m interval by emptying the sample on to a table, mixing and splitting into 1/8th subsamples and randomly assigning 4 of the splits into the duplicate and 4 remaining as the primary. • The 1.5‐2.5 kg sample collected in the calico bag was logged by the geologist onsite. • Approximately 10‐20g of sample material from each for each 1m calico sample placed in a chip tray. • The logged calico samples were scanned with a pXRF onsite through the calico bag. • At the end of the drillhole samples were Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. selected for analysis. • Samples selected for analysis were placed in polyweave bags labelled with the sample number, From‐To interval, and Hole ID, then segregated into bulka bags for transport to the lab for analysis. • No correction factors were applied to pXRF results. • Field duplicates of all the samples were completed at a frequency of ~1 in 40 samples. Field standards were inserted into the sample sequence at a frequency of ~1:40. Standard reference Material (SRM) samples were inserted into the sample batches at a frequency rate of 1 per 10 samples by the laboratory and a repeat sample was taken at a rate of 1 per 21 samples. • An on‐site geologist oversaw the sampling and logging process and selected samples for analysis based on the logging descriptions Pxrf analysis, and downhole gamma response. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e., lack of •The detailed geological logging of samples provides lithology (sand/clay component) •The 1.5 kg air core samples were assayed by Bureau Veritas laboratory in Wingfield, Adelaide, South Australia, which is considered the Primary laboratory. •The samples will be initially oven dried at 105 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. Samples will be secondary crushed to 3 mm fraction and the weight recorded. The sample will then be pulverised to 90% passing 75 µm. Excess residue will be maintained for storage while the rest of the sample is placed in 8x4 packets and sent to the central weighing laboratory. •All weighed samples will then be analysed using the Multiple Elements Fusion/Mixed Acid Digest analytical method; •ICP Scan (Mixed Acid Digest – Lithium Borate Fusion) Samples are digested using a mixed acid digest and also fused with Lithium Borate to ensure all elements are brought into solution. The bias) and precision have been established. digests are then analysed for the following elements (detection Limits shown): Al (100) As (1) Ba (1) Be (0.5) Ca(100) Ce (0.1) Co (1) Cr (10) Dy (0.05) Er (0.05) Eu(0.05) Fe(100) Gd (0.2) Ho (0.02) K (100) La (0.5) Lu (0.02) Mg (100) Mn (2) Na (100) Nd (0.05) Ni (2) Pr (0.2) S (50) Sc (1) Si (100) Sm(0.05) Sr (0.5) Th (0.1) Ti (50) Tm (0.2) U (0.1) V (5) Y (0.1) Yb (0.05) Zr (1) • Select samples that were deemed likely to be of basement lithology (or saprolite) were also analyzed for Au Fire Assay with a detection limit of (0.01) •Field duplicates were collected and submitted at a frequency of ~1 per 40 samples. • Bureau Veritas will complete its own internal QA/QC checks that include a Laboratory repeat every 21st sample and a standard reference sample every 9th sample prior to the results being released.; • Australian Rare Earths submitted field standards at a frequency of ~1:40 samples. • Australian Rare Earths inserted field blanks at a frequency of ~1:40 samples. The adopted QA/QC protocols are acceptable for this stage of test work. The sample preparation and assay techniques used are industry standard and provide a total analysis. Historical data referenced within this report is detailed below; • • The Fairview uranium occurrence an is based on reported SA Geodatabase Reference sample #152296 (Explorers sample 45835) sourced from the SA Geodatabase available on SARIG (https://minerals.sarig.sa.gov.au/RockSample Details.aspx?SampleNo=45835) Sample #152296 was collected by A.F. Crooks Verification of sampling and assaying Location of data points on 20/08/1984 and the sample was analyzed by XRF, details on the lab or XRF device were not specified. The verification of • All results are checked by the company’s significant intersections by Chief Technical Officer. either independent or • Field based geological logging for drill holes alternative company was entered directly into an Excel spreadsheet personnel. format with validation rules built into the The use of twinned holes. spreadsheet including specific drop‐down menus Documentation of primary for each variable. This digital data was then data, data entry uploaded to the Australian Rare Earths Azure Data procedures, data Studio database. verification, data storage • Assay data will be received in digital format (physical and electronic) from the laboratory and uploaded to Australian protocols. Rare Earths Azure Data Studio database. Discuss any adjustment to • Field and laboratory duplicate data pairs of assay data. each batch will be plotted to identify potential quality control issues. • Standard Reference Material sample results will be checked from each sample batch to ensure they are within tolerance (<3SD) and that there is no bias. • U3O8 is the industry accepted form for reporting Uranium. An oxide factor for U3O8 of 1.1793 was used for reporting throughout this report. Accuracy and quality of • All maps are in GDA94/MGA zone 54. surveys used to locate drill • All overland coordinate information was holes (collar and down‐ collected using handheld GPS utilizing hole surveys), trenches, GDA 1994, Zone 54. While spatial mine workings and other location is expected to be recovered locations used in Mineral within 3 – 5 m, it is possible that the Resource estimation. elevation can be as much as 10 m out Specification of the grid with respect to the currently established system used. geoid. Quality and adequacy of • Drillhole RL has been corrected using An topographic control. Australian wide SRTM. The 1 second SRTM Level 2 Derived Smoothed Digital Elevation Model (DEM‐S) is derived from the 2000 SRTM. The DEM‐S has a ~30m grid which has been adaptively smoothed to improve the representation of the surface shape and is the preferred method for shape and vertical accuracy from STRM products. The smoothing process estimated typical improvements in the order of 2‐3 m. This would make the DEM‐S accuracy to be of approximately 5 m. Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been • Locations of Overland drill holes are reported within the appendices of this report. • No geological or grade continuity estimations are being determined from the Overland drilling data. applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • All Overland drill holes were drilled vertically as detailed in the appendices of this report. • There is no indication that a sampling bias exists as the geology is relatively flat lying therefore vertical holes are appropriate. Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. • • Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. After logging, the samples in calico bags were tied and placed into polyweave bags, labelled with the d