19 June 2024 AR3 Extends High-Grade mineralisation 60km South of Koppamurra Resource Highlights • New rare earth discovery south of Koppamurra: Assay results from a regional hand auger program have identified shallow clay-hosted rare earth mineralisation up to 60 km south of AR3’s Koppamurra Resource (which includes 186 million tonnes at 712 ppm Total Rare Earth Oxides (TREO)(ASX 19/09/2023)). • Extensive mineralised zone: Assays confirm the extensive nature of the mineralised clay, opening up the southern tenements to follow up exploration and providing strong evidence of the rare earth province potential. • Shallow, high-grade clays: Shallow clays with rare earth grades and assemblages comparable to the Koppamurra Resource have been identified within previously unexplored southern tenements EL6942 and EL6943. • Significant dysprosium (Dy) content: The samples contain Dy, a critical heavy rare earth element, at levels of up to 4.0% of the TREO content. • High-grade mineralisation intersected includes: o Hole/Sample 715464, 1,889 ppm Total Rare Earth Oxide (TREO) sampled 0.7m below surface, with 27.6% combined Neodymium/Praseodymium (Nd/Pr) and 3.1% Dysprosium (Dy) o Hole/Sample 715321, 1,654 ppm TREO sampled 1.4m below surface, with 24.7% combined Nd/Pr and 2.2% Dy o Hole/Sample 715497 1,631 ppm TREO sampled 0.7m below surface, with 22.4% combined Nd/Pr and 3.2% Dy o Hole/Sample 715405 1,496 ppm TREO sampled 1.4m below surface, with 22.2% combined Nd/Pr and 3.2% Dy o Hole/Sample 715299 1,286 ppm TREO sampled 1.0m below surface, with 23.0% combined Nd/Pr and 3.0% Dy o Hole/Sample 715108 1,147 ppm TREO sampled 2.0m below surface with 20.5% combined Nd/Pr and 4.0% Dy • Click here to watch a short video on this from our MD and CEO, Travis Beinke, or ask us any questions. Australian Rare Earths Limited (ASX: AR3) is pleased to announce that assay results from its recent roadside hand auger sampling campaign have identified shallow, clay-hosted rare earth element (REE) mineralisation extending 60 kilometers south of its Koppamurra Resource in South Australia. The program was designed to advance exploration using a cost-effective, low-impact exploration technique targeting shallow, less than 2m deep, REE mineralisation on AR3’s southern tenements EL6942 and EL6943 (Figure 1). Assays confirm the extensive nature of the mineralised clay, opening up the southern tenements for followup exploration and providing strong evidence of the district's rare earth potential. Shallow clays with REE grades and assemblages comparable to the Koppamurra Resource have been identified, containing dysprosium, a critical rare earth element used in high-tech applications, at levels of up to 4.0% of the TREO content. Figure 1- Roadside auger sampling (left) and high-grade mineralised clay sample 715464 (right) which contained 1,889 ppm TREO and 3.1% Dy sampled from 0.7m below surface. The auger program, which began in February and concluded in May 2024, has covered a large portion of EL6942 and EL6943 utilising the extensive road verge network in the region (Figure 2). A total of 1047 auger holes/samples were collected from an average sampling depth of 1.1m of which, 371 samples which were submitted for analysis. The hand auger program was limited to a maximum sampling depth of 2m, therefore only exceptional shallow lithologies were able to be sampled. Over 70% of the auger holes intersected clay and although significant shallow mineralised clays within the southern part of EL6943 were identified, other areas, like the northwestern portion of EL6942 which did not intersect significant mineralisation, remain prospective as mineralised clays may be deeper than the 2.0m hand auger could achieve. A total of 129 of the 371 auger samples sent for assay (35%) contained mineralised clays >350ppm TREO and 26 of the 371 auger samples (7%) contained >750 ppm TREO (Figure 3). The results are highly encouraging due to the exceptionally shallow nature of the mineralised clays occurring over 60km from the Koppamurra Resource with comparable grades and magnet rare earth assemblage to the Koppamurra Resource. The auger program will further inform the next stage of exploration in the southern region and builds confidence on the continuation of the widespread nature of the mineralised clays supporting a province wide REE potential in the region. AR3 Managing Director Travis Beinke said: “Our regional exploration program has unearthed extensive shallow clay-hosted REE mineralisation extending a full 60 kilometers south of our flagship Koppamurra Resource. This discovery not only expands the potential footprint of our province significantly, but the presence of high-grade clays and noteworthy dysprosium content within the newly identified zone paints a very exciting picture for the future. Importantly, this auger program paves the way for follow-up exploration drilling in the southern tenements, solidifying our extensive province position." Figure 2 – Auger hole locations and significant TREO assays relative to Koppamurra Resource. Figure 3 – Significant auger samples. The announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Australian Rare Earths Limited. For further information please contact: Australian Rare Earths Limited Travis Beinke Managing Director T: 1 300 646 100 Media Enquiries Jessica Fertig Tau Media E: jessica@taumedia.com.au Competent Person’s Statement The information in this report that relates to Exploration results is based on information compiled by Australian Rare Earths Limited and reviewed by Mr Rick Pobjoy who is the Chief Technical Officer of the Company and a member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM). Mr Pobjoy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation, the type of deposit under consideration and to the activities undertaken to qualify as a Competent person as defined in the 2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves”. Mr Pobjoy consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on this information in the form and context in which it appears. About Australian Rare Earths Limited Australian Rare Earths is committed to the timely exploration and development of its 100% owned, flagship Koppamurra Project, located in the new Koppamurra rare earths Province in southeastern South Australia and western Victoria. Koppamurra is a prospective ionic clay hosted rare earth deposit, uniquely rich in all the elements required in the manufacture of rare earth permanent magnets which are essential components in electric vehicles, wind turbines and domestic appliances. In addition, AR3 is actively reviewing other potential prospective areas which may also host uranium and ionic clay hosted rare earth deposits throughout Australia. The Company is focused on executing a growth strategy that will ensure AR3 is positioned to become an independent and sustainable source of energy transition metals, playing a pivotal role in the global transition to a green economy. https://investorhub.ar3.com.au/link/lPd0LP JORC Table 1 Criteria Sampling techniques Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Explanation Comment Nature and quality of Manual Hand Auger methods were used to sampling (e.g., cut obtain samples from the February- May 2024 channels, random chips, or sampling program. specific specialised The following information covers the sampling industry standard process: measurement tools • All samples were collected via the use of a appropriate to the manual hand auger and placed into a preminerals under numbered calico bag. The collected samples investigation, such as were geologically logged using the marked down hole gamma sondes, calico sample which averaged ~1.5 kg in or handheld XRF mass. instruments, etc). These • A handheld Olympus Vanta XFR Analyser examples should not be was used to assess the geochemistry of the taken as limiting the broad hand auger samples in the field. The XRF meaning of sampling. analysis provided a full suite of mineral Include reference to elements for characterising the lithological measures taken to units. ensure sample • XRF readings were downloaded from the representivity and the XRF Analyser at the end of each day and appropriate calibration uploaded to the Australian Rare Earths of any measurement Azure Data Studio database. tools or systems used. Aspects of the • At the laboratory, the samples were oven determination of dried at 105 degrees for a minimum of 24 mineralisation that are hours and secondary crushed to 3 mm Material to the Public fraction and then pulverised to 90% passing Report. In cases where 75 µm. Excess residue was maintained for ‘industry standard’ work storage while the rest of the sample placed has been done this would in 8x4 packets and sent to the central be relatively simple (e.g., weighing laboratory. The samples were ‘reverse circulation drilling submitted for analysis using XRF-ICP-MS was used to obtain 1 m method. samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce • A laboratory repeat was taken at ~ 1 in 21 samples. a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (e.g., submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Drilling techniques Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, openhole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g., core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit, or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • • • • • Drill sample recovery Logging Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or • Hand auger drilling was completed using a manual hand auger with a Clay sample bit. Hand Auger drilling is a form of manual drilling where the sample is collected at the face and contained inside the bit. The drill cuttings are removed from the bit by removing the auger from the hole and manually collecting the sample. A 83mm Clay hand auger bit was used with a 1 meter steel rod extension to allow for maximum 2 meter sample depth. All hand auger holes were vertical with depths varying between 0 m and 2 m. The auger bit is cleaned between holes to avoid contamination. Sample recoveries were not recorded as the sample material was collected form the base of the auger holes to allow for a 11.5kg sample size. • All hand auger samples were collected in calico bags were logged for lithology, colour, and any relevant comments such as moisture, sample condition, or vegetation. • Geological logging data for all hand auger holes was qualitatively logged onto ArcGIS Field maps using a Samsung tablet with validation rules built into the software including specific drop- down menus for each variable. The data was uploaded to the Australian Rare Earths Azure Data costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation Quality of assay data and laboratory tests If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all cores taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. Studio database. • Every auger hole was logged in full and logging was undertaken with reference to a auger sampling template with codes prescribed and guidance to ensure consistent and systematic data collection • Photos of each auger sample site were taken before and after hand augering including a photo of the sample material collected. • The 1.5 kg sample was collected in a prenumbered calico bag. • The 1.5 kg sample collected in the calico bag was logged by the geotechnician onsite. The logged samples were placed in polyweave bags and sent to Naracoorte base at the end of each day. The polyweave bags were then placed on pallets and dispatched to Bureau Veritas laboratory in Adelaide in Bulka Bags. • A geotechnician oversaw the sampling and logging process while a geologist selected samples for analysis based on the logging descriptions and Pxrf analysis. Clay rich sample and those adjacent to the limestone basement contact were selected for assay. REEs are known to be contained within the clay component of the sediment package based on analysis of XRF data and previous exploration work. • • The 1.5 kg hand auger samples were assayed by Bureau Veritas laboratory in Wingfield, Adelaide, South Australia, which is considered the Primary laboratory. The samples were initially oven dried at 105 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. Samples were For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e., lack of bias) and precision have been established. • • • • • Verification of sampling secondary crushed to 3 mm fraction and the weight recorded. The sample was then pulverised to 90% passing 75 µm. Excess residue was maintained for storage while the rest of the sample placed in 8x4 packets and sent to the central weighing laboratory. All weighed samples were then analysed using the Multiple Elements Fusion/Mixed Acid Digest analytical method; ICP Scan (Mixed Acid Digest – Lithium Borate Fusion) Samples are digested using a mixed acid digest and also fused with Lithium Borate to ensure all elements are brought into solution. The digests are then analysed for the following elements (detection Limits shown): Al (100) As (1) Ba (1) Be (0.5) Ca(100) Ce (0.1) Co (1) Cr (10) Dy (0.05) Er (0.05) Eu(0.05) Fe(100) Gd (0.2) Ho (0.02) K (100) La (0.5) Lu (0.02) Mg (100) Mn (2) Na (100) Nd (0.05) Ni (2) Pr (0.2) S (50) Sc (1) Si (100) Sm(0.05) Sr (0.5) Th (0.1) Ti (50) Tm (0.2) U (0.1) V (5) Y (0.1) Yb (0.05) Zr (1) Bureau Veritas completed its own internal QA/QC checks that included a Laboratory repeat every 21st sample and a standard reference sample every 9th sample prior to the results being released. Analysis of QA/QC samples show the laboratory data to be of acceptable accuracy and precision. Australian Rare Earths requested BV insert blank washes at a frequency of 1:40 samples. These blank washes were inserted in the sample sequence behind samples which were thought to be mineralized to ensure that no contamination from higher grade samples was occurring. Frequency of blank samples totaled 1 in 31 samples. The adopted QA/QC protocols are acceptable for this stage of test work. The sample preparation and assay techniques used are industry standard and provide a total analysis. The verification of • All results are checked by the company’s significant intersections by Chief Technical Officer. and assaying either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • • • • • • • Geological logging data for all hand auger holes was qualitatively logged onto ArcGIS Field maps using a Samsung tablet with validation rules built into the software including specific drop- down menus for each variable. This digital data was then uploaded to the Australian Rare Earths Azure Data Studio database. Assay data was received in digital format from the laboratory and was uploaded Australian Rare Earths Azure Data Studio database. Laboratory duplicate data pairs of each batch are plotted to identify potential quality control issues. Standard Reference Material sample results are checked from each sample batch to ensure they are within tolerance (<3SD) and that there is no bias. Assay data yielding elemental concentrations for rare earths (REE) within the sample are converted to their stoichiometric oxides (REO) in a calculation performed within the database using the conversion factors in the below table. Rare earth oxide is the industry accepted form for reporting rare earths. The following calculations have been used for reporting throughout this report: Note that Y2O3 is included in the TREO, HREO and CREO calculation. TREO = La2O3 + CeO2 + Pr6O11 + Nd2O3 + Sm2O3+ Eu2O3 + Gd2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3 + Ho2O3 + Er2O3 + Tm2O3 + Yb2O3 + Lu2O3+ Y2O3 CREO = Nd2O3 + Eu2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3 + Y2O3 LREO = La2O3 + CeO2 + Pr6O11 + Nd2O3 HREO = Sm2O3 + Eu2O3 + Gd2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3 + Ho2O3 + Er2O3 + Tm2O3 + Yb2O3+ Lu2O3 + Y2O3 NdPr = Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 TREO-Ce = TREO - CeO2 NdPr = Nd + Pr Element Oxide CeO2 Dy2O3 Er2O3 Eu2O3 Gd2O3 Ho2O3 La2O3 Lu2O3 Nd2O3 Pr6O11 Sc2O3 Sm2O3 Tb4O7 ThO2 Tm2O3 U3O8 Y2O3 Yb2O3 Location of data points Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and downhole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Oxide Factor 1.2284 1.1477 1.1435 1.1579 1.1526 1.1455 1.1728 1.1371 1.1664 1.2082 1.5338 1.1596 1.1762 1.1379 1.1421 1.1793 1.2699 1.1387 • Down hole surveys for shallow vertical hand auger holes are not required. • The drill hole collars were located using a GPS unit to identify the positions of the drill holes in the field. The handheld GPS has an accuracy of +/-5m in the horizontal. • The datum used is GDA2020/MGA Zone 54. • Topographic DTM surface over the Southern exploration area is derived from an Australian wide SRTM. The 1 second SRTM Level 2 Derived Smoothed Digital Elevation Model (DEM-S) is derived from the 2000 SRTM. The DEM-S has a ~30m grid which has been adaptively smoothed to improve the representation of the surface shape and is the preferred method for shape and vertical accuracy from STRM products. The smoothing process estimated typical improvements in the order of 2-3 m. This would make the DEM-S accuracy to be of approximately 5 m. • The accuracy of the locations is sufficient for this stage of exploration. Data spacing and distribution Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Sample security Data spacing for reporting • The holes were largely drilled at between of Exploration Results. 100 m and 400 m spacings along accessible Whether the data spacing, road verges. and distribution is • The drilling of hand auger holes was sufficient to establish the conducted to determine the regional degree of geological and prospectivity of the wider Koppamurra grade continuity Project area. appropriate for the • No sample compositing has been Mineral Resource and Ore applied. Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Whether the orientation of • The Koppamurra mineralisation is sampling achieves interpreted to be hosted in flat lying clays unbiased sampling of that are horizontal. Undulation of the clay possible structures and the unit is influenced by the weathered limestone extent to which this is basement below. known, considering the • All auger holes are vertical which is deposit type. appropriate for horizontal bedding and If the relationship between regolith profile. the drilling orientation and • The strike of the mineralisation is north the orientation of key south, and the high grades follow a mineralised structures is northwest-southeast trend. considered to have • All hand auger holes were vertical, introduced a sampling and the orientation of the bias, this should be mineralisation is relatively horizontal. assessed and reported if material. The measures taken to • After logging, the samples in calico bags ensure sample security. were tied and placed into polyweave bags, labelled with the sample numbers contained within the polyweave and transported to the base of operations, Naracoorte, at the end of each day. • The samples were then placed on pallets ready for transport and remained in a secure compound until transport had been arranged. Pallets were labelled and then ‘shrink-wrapped’ by the transport contractor prior to departure from the Naracoorte base to the analytical laboratory. • Samples for analysis were logged against pallet identifiers and a chain of custody form created. Audits or reviews The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Transport to the analytical laboratory was undertaken by an agent for the TOLL Logistics Group, and consignment numbers were logged against the chain of custody forms. • The laboratory inspected the packages and did not report tampering of the samples and provided a sample reconciliation report for each sample dispatch. Internal reviews were undertaken by AR3’s Exploration Manager and Chief Technical officer during the auger, sampling, and geological logging process and throughout the sample collection and dispatch process to ensure AR3’s protocols were followed. A review of the database was also undertaken by Wallbridge Gilbert Aztec (WGA) – Consulting Engineers. • • Criteria Mineral tenement and land tenure status Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results Explanation Comment Type, reference Koppamurra Project comprises of a name/number, location granted South Australian Exploration and ownership including Licences (EL), EL6509, EL6613, EL6690, agreements or material EL6691, EL6942, and EL6943 along with issues with third parties Victorian EL007254, EL007719, EL008208 such as joint ventures, and EL008254 covering a combined area of partnerships, overriding ~7,400 km2 which is in good standing. royalties, native title EL6509 is within 100m of a Glen Roy interests, historical sites, Conservation Park and the Naracoorte wilderness or national Caves National Park, the latter of which is park and environmental excised from the tenement. The License settings. area contains several small Extractive The security of the tenure Mineral Leases (EML) held by others, held at the time of Native Vegetation Heritage Agreement reporting along with any areas, as well as the Deadman’s Swamp known impediments to Wetlands which are wetlands of national obtaining a licence to importance. operate in the area. A Native Title Claim by the First Nations of the South East #1 has been registered but is yet to be determined. The claim area includes the areas covered by EL’s 6509, 6613, 6690 and 6691. The exploration work was completed on the tenements (EL 6509 and EL6613) in South Australia and (EL007254 and EL007719) in Victoria which are 100% owned by the company Australian Rare Earths Ltd. The Exploration License EL6509 original date of grant was 15/09/2020 with an expiry date of 14/09/2028. The Exploration License EL6613 original date of grant was 06/07/2021 with an expiry date of 05/07/2027. The Exploration License EL6690 original date of grant was 02/11/2021 with an expiry date of 01/11/2027. The Exploration License EL6691 original date of grant was 02/11/2021 with an expiry date of 01/11/2027. The Exploration License EL6942 original date of grant was 17/10/2023 with an expiry date of 16/10/2029. The Exploration License EL6943 original date of grant was 17/10/2023 with an expiry date of 16/10/2029. The Exploration License EL007254 original date of grant was 29/04/2021 with an expiry date of 28/04/2024. The Exploration License EL007719 original date of grant was 29/08/2022 with an expiry date of 28/08/2027. The Exploration License EL008208 original date of grant was 11/06/2024 with an expiry date of 10/06/2029. The Exploration License EL008254 original date of grant was 11/06/2024 with an expiry date of 10/06/2029. Details regarding royalties are discussed in chapter 3.4 of Australian Rare Earths Prospectus dated 7 May 2021. Exploration done by other parties Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. Exploration activities by other exploration companies in the area have not previously targeted or identified REE mineralisation. Historical exploration activities in the vicinity of Koppamurra include investigations for coal, gold and base metals, uranium, and heavy mineral sands. Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Historical exploration by other parties is detailed in Chapter 7 of Australian Rare Earths Prospectus dated 7 May 2021. The Koppamurra deposit is interpreted to contain analogies to ion adsorption ionic clay REE deposits. REE mineralisation at Koppamurra is hosted by clayey sediments interpreted to have been deposited onto a limestone base (Gambier Limestone) and accumulated in an interdunal, lagoonal or estuarine environment. A dedicated research program investigating the source of the REE at Koppamurra is ongoing, with no definitive source of the REE confirmed to date although preliminary results of this study have ruled out the alkali volcanics in southeastern Australia which was originally considered. Mineralogical test work conducted on clay sample from the project area established that the dominant clay minerals are smectite and kaolin, and that the few REErich minerals detected during the SEM investigation are not considered inconsistent with the suggestion that a significant proportion of REE are distributed in the material as adsorbed elements on clay and iron oxide surfaces. There are several known types of regolith hosted REE deposits including, ion adsorption clay deposits, alluvial and placer deposits. Whilst Koppamurra shares similarities with both ion adsorption clay deposits and volcanic ash fall placer deposits, there are also several differences, highlighting the need for further work before a genetic model for REE mineralisation at Koppamurra can be confirmed. Drill hole Information Data aggregation methods A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: - easting and northing of the drill hole collar - elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar - dip and azimuth of the hole - down hole length and interception depth - hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate There is insufficient geological work undertaken to determine any geological disruptions, such as faults or dykes, that may cause variability in the mineralisation. The material information for auger hole relating to this report are contained within Appendices of this release. No metal equivalents have been used. A full list of drill holes with all MREO assay results can be found in the appendices of this release. Relationship between mineralisatio n widths and intercept lengths Diagrams Balanced reporting short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not known’). Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to No assessment of the widths of mineralization was made and sampling was undertaken only to confirm or otherwise the presence of REE mineralization. The mineralisation is interpreted to be flat lying. Morphology of the mineralised unit is influenced by the morphology of the undulating limestone basement below. Drilling is vertical perpendicular to mineralisation. Any internal variations to